Thu, 11 Feb 2010

One of Three

When a government spends money, there are only three places that money could have come from:

  1. Taxation -- by taking the money away from someone.
  2. Borrowing -- by temporarily taking the money away from someone, with a promise of returning it at a higher value.
  3. Inflating -- by printing money, which reduces the value of all the other money that people hold.

Of these, the last is the most regressive and pernicious. Not only does it reduce the savings of the middle class, but it also causes people to think they have more money than they really have.

Which one, do you suppose, do politicians choose most often? Right: inflating and borrowing. That's because taxpayers feel the pain of taxation most directly.

Posted [00:00] [Filed in: ] [permalink] [Google for the title] economics,politicians,idiots,ohbutIrepeatMyself [digg this]

Sun, 07 Feb 2010

Federal Spending vs Candidate spending

Seems like every handful of years, somebody starts yammering about how much money candidates spend to get elected. About how that spending is going up and up and up. And they claim that that's a sure sign of corruption.

Not likely. Look instead at the ratio of federal spending versus spending by presidential candidates over several decades:

See how the ratio varies between 1 and 20.5 and 2.5? That's because candidates spend in proportion to the power they'll have. If you want them to spend less, expect them to do less and spend less of your own money.

UPDATE 2/8/2010: Sam Nelson of fame (which would let you guess his email address) noticed that I was plotting the wrong column from the DebtArticle.csv dataset. I've re-generated the plot, and included 2008 spending (which is for a partial year, so in your head, move the rightmost point lower). The graph is a little more noisy, but still serves to make my point.

Data sources: Federal spending and Presidential campaign spending.

Posted [00:00] [Filed in: ] [permalink] [Google for the title] economics,politics,campaign,finance,reform [digg this]

Mon, 01 Feb 2010

xkcd and Rule Making

Haha! xkcd notes that some problems are simply hard to solve. That attempting to impose a solution is not necessarily an improvement. That sometimes it makes the situation much, much worse."

Posted [00:00] [Filed in: ] [permalink] [Google for the title] xkcd,economics,legislation [digg this]